Resecurity Catches Hackers Red-Handed with Deliberate Honeypot Trap

In a satisfying twist for the cybersecurity community, threat actors who claimed to have breached security firm Resecurity were actually caught in a carefully laid honeypot trap—walking away with nothing but fake data while Resecurity monitored their every move.

The Claim

Threat actors associated with "Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters" (SLH) contacted Dissent Doe of DataBreaches.net earlier this week, claiming to have breached Resecurity's systems and stolen internal data. The group provided what they claimed was evidence of compromise.

It looked like another embarrassing breach of a cybersecurity vendor—the kind of incident that damages reputations and shakes customer confidence.

The Reality

Resecurity had a different story: the attackers only accessed a deliberately deployed honeypot system containing fabricated information specifically designed to attract and monitor threat actors.

According to Resecurity, the honeypot was set up to:

• Track attacker methodology and tooling
• Identify indicators of compromise for threat intelligence
• Study threat actor behavior in a controlled environment
• Generate early warning signals of targeting activity

The "stolen data" the attackers proudly shared? Intentionally planted decoy information with no connection to actual customer or company data.

Verification Supports Resecurity's Account

Dissent Doe, who reviewed the data provided by the threat actors, noted that their examination indicated customer data was not actually stolen. This independent assessment aligns with Resecurity's honeypot explanation.

The incident demonstrates how deception technology can turn the tables on attackers—transforming a potential breach into valuable threat intelligence.

Honeypots: The Cybersecurity Trap

Honeypots are deliberately vulnerable systems or data stores designed to attract attackers. When executed properly, they serve multiple purposes:

Intelligence Gathering: Attackers reveal their tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) while interacting with the honeypot, providing defenders with actionable intelligence.

Early Warning: Honeypot access can indicate that threat actors are actively targeting an organization, allowing for proactive defensive measures.

Resource Waste: Attackers expend time and effort on fake targets instead of real systems.

Attribution: Monitoring attacker behavior can help identify specific threat groups or individuals.

A Lesson in Claiming Too Soon

The SLH incident highlights the risks of threat actors announcing breaches before verifying what they actually obtained. In their rush to claim a high-profile victim—a cybersecurity company—they've now been publicly embarrassed.

For the threat actor community, breaching a security firm represents a significant status symbol. That made Resecurity's honeypot an attractive target—and an effective trap.

Deception Technology Gains Momentum

The incident comes as deception technology sees increased adoption across enterprise security programs. Modern deception platforms can deploy honeypots, honey tokens, and decoy assets across network environments at scale.

Vendors like Attivo Networks (now acquired by SentinelOne), Illusive Networks, and Acalvio have built entire security categories around weaponizing fake assets against attackers.

When an attacker touches a honeypot, security teams receive high-fidelity alerts. Unlike the false positives that plague many security tools, honeypot alerts indicate definite malicious activity—legitimate users have no reason to access decoy systems.

The Bigger Picture

This incident sends a message: security companies aren't passive targets. The tools and techniques designed to catch attackers can be deployed against those who target cybersecurity firms themselves.

For threat actors targeting the security industry, the lesson is clear—that breach you're celebrating might be exactly what the defender wanted you to find.

---

Resecurity's use of honeypots demonstrates mature security operations that go beyond passive defense. Organizations looking to implement similar deception capabilities should consider how honeypots fit into their broader threat intelligence and detection strategies.